Where to start: Use of the bilingual multidimensional ability scale (B-MAS) to identify developmental language disorder (DLD) in bilingual children.

PURPOSE: The identification of developmental language disorder (DLD) is challenging for clinicians who assess bilinguals. This paper introduces a protocol-based approach, the Bilingual Multidimensional Ability Scale (B-MAS), for expert raters to identify DLD in bilinguals. METHOD: Three bilingual speech-language pathologists (SLPs) reviewed 166 Spanish-English bilingual children's profiles, which included performance on direct (morphosyntax, semantics, and narrative tasks) and indirect (parent/teacher survey) measures in both languages. A multidimensional scale (0-5) was adopted to rate children's performance. A diagnosis of DLD was made if at least two raters assigned a summary rating of ≤2. RESULT: Analysis of the scores on the B-MAS resulted in the identification of 21 children as having DLD. Though different strategies were employed to make decisions, the three SLPs demonstrated high inter-rater agreement across different ratings (intraclass correlation coefficient values ranged from .83 to .90). CONCLUSION: For bilingual populations that are understudied and for which gold standards of assessment are not available, the B-MAS can be adopted as a starting point to study DLD or as a reference standard to develop new assessment tools in that population. Clinically, this protocol could be tailored and evaluated by a group of SLPs serving a large population of a particular bilingual group for diagnostic purposes.

Determining the Diagnostic Accuracy of the Test of Integrated Language and Literacy Skills for College Students.

PURPOSE: This study sought to determine whether the Test of Integrated Language and Literacy Skills (TILLS; Nelson et al., 2016) can accurately identify language disorders in college-aged adults. METHOD: Fifty-nine college students between the ages of 18 and 23 years were administered the test battery validated by Fidler et al. (2011) for the diagnosis of language disorders as well as the Identification Core (ID Core) subtests of the TILLS validated for ages 12-18 years. Sensitivity and specificity information was calculated for the TILLS at various cut-scores to determine the diagnostic accuracy of the ID Core for this population. Discriminant function analysis was also performed to determine if sensitivity and specificity could be improved using empirically derived discriminant scores. RESULTS: The recommended cut-score of 42 for ages 12-18 years underidentified individuals with language disorders in this sample. An adjusted cut-score of 51 maximized sensitivity and specificity to acceptable levels. Discriminant function analysis also yielded acceptable sensitivity and specificity (> 80%). CONCLUSION: Using either an adjusted cut-score for the ID Core or weighted discriminant scores, the TILLS can be used to accurately differentiate between college-aged adults with and without language disorders.